It is incredibly ambitious to randomly choose from 100 prepared bits over the run of a festival and perform them in unknown combinations of 10-12 per show. I think the concept is brilliant (especially the refusal to repeat a bit once it's been done in a show) and the actors' presentation of the concept deconstructs the very idea of a Fringe show in some ways.

That being said, not all 100 are going to be winners and the selection we had at the show I attended had some bits that just didn't land. The ones that did were really clever, refined, and had a point of view, but being interspersed with less strong bits waters down the impact unfortunately.

You can also tell it's a big source of pride among the actors that the festival had to audit their bits ahead of time this year given an incident from a prior festival season, but the constant references to that get old quick and show a lack of confidence – if you're going to be controversial just be controversial, you don't need to keep insisting what bad boys you've been.

Overall I think it's worth a watch, but be prepared to roll the dice on what you'll get and know that it may not be their best material on a given night (which I suppose is the point).